9/24/2007

Blacks and America’s Religious Divides

Algernon Austin presents an excellent, concise, and wonderfully read scholarly examination of the complicated landscape of race, class and popular perception. Besides the prison industrial complex, black strides in education, poverty rates, crime and other indices contradict claims that blacks are “moving backward.”
--Jeffrey O. G. Ogbar, Director, Institute for African American Studies, University of Connecticut and author of Black Power: Radical Politics and African American Identity (The Johns Hopkins University Press), 2004 and Hip-Hop Revolution: The Culture and Politics of Rap (University Press of Kansas), 2007.


Purchase Getting It Wrong: How Black Public Intellectuals
Are Failing Black America
by Algernon Austin
Barnes & Noble.com Amazon.com

[Find out The Truth about Black Students.]
________________________________________________________________________

Blacks are among America’s most devout Christians. But not all black Christians share the same views on social and political issues. At the intersection of religion and politics one sees some of the ideological diversity in black America. On some issues black Christians are nearly evenly divided, on others a majority of black Christians agree. Also, often black Christians appear to agree more with white evangelical Protestants than white mainline Protestants.

The following discussion is based on the 2006 U.S. Religion Survey by the Pew Research Center. The results of this survey were published in two parts. (Part I, Part II)

Few Americans identify as belonging to the religious right or religious left, but blacks are more likely to identify as belonging to one or the other than whites. Blacks are more than twice as likely as whites to consider themselves as belonging to the religious left. Blacks are also nearly twice as likely as whites to claim membership in the religious right.

Adapted from Many Americans Uneasy with Mix of Religion and Politics, Pew Research Center, 2006, p. 10.

Most Americans believe that the will of the people should determine U.S. laws. Blacks are almost evenly divided with half saying that the Bible should determine U.S. laws and 48 percent saying the people’s will. On this issue black Protestants look more like white evangelicals than white mainline Protestants.

Black clergy appear to be more politically-engaged than white clergy—mainline and evangelical. Black clergy speak out more on Iraq, homosexuality, the environment, evolution, the death penalty and immigration than white clergy. Unfortunately, these quantitative findings do not tell us much about what clergy are actually saying about these topics.

Fifty-nine percent of black Protestants are opposed to abortion; 36 percent of them think it should be allowed. This split is similar to the split among white evangelicals. Black Protestants also look similar to white evangelicals on the issue of gay marriage. Seventy-four percent of black Protestants oppose gay marriage. Seventy-eight percent of white feel the same.

Adapted from Pragmatic Americans Liberal and Conservative on Social Issues, Pew Research Center, 2006, p. 4, 8.

If the America continues to wrestle with issues at the intersection of religion and politics, there could be a realignment of the black political landscape. Many blacks’ religious beliefs appear to align with that of white evangelicals. A sizeable minority of blacks though may support positions more generally accepted by white mainline Protestants.


Share this article with a friend. Use the email icon below.

--Algernon Austin, Ph.D.

Copyright © 2005-2007 by Thora Institute, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Reprint this article in your newspaper or magazine. Contact the Thora Institute to purchase reprint rights.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[The Thora Institute needs you.]

9/17/2007

What Journalists Need to Know about the SAT

Algernon Austin presents an excellent, concise, and wonderfully read scholarly examination of the complicated landscape of race, class and popular perception. Besides the prison industrial complex, black strides in education, poverty rates, crime and other indices contradict claims that blacks are “moving backward.”
--Jeffrey O. G. Ogbar, Director, Institute for African American Studies, University of Connecticut and author of Black Power: Radical Politics and African American Identity (The Johns Hopkins University Press), 2004 and Hip-Hop Revolution: The Culture and Politics of Rap (University Press of Kansas), 2007.


Purchase Getting It Wrong: How Black Public Intellectuals
Are Failing Black America
by Algernon Austin
Barnes & Noble.com Amazon.com

[Find out The Truth about Black Students.]
________________________________________________________________________

The latest aggregate SAT scores were recently released. Journalists, once again, failed to understand that the SAT is not very accurate for making group comparisons or for comparing groups over time.

The SAT vs. The long-term trend NAEP

Not everyone goes to college. Of those who do go to college, not everyone takes the SAT. Some take the ACT. Some do not take the SAT or the ACT, because it is not required by their college. For this reason, it is incorrect to think that the SAT provides a good picture of the academic achievement of all high school seniors.

The types of students who take the SAT have changed over time. Children of high socioeconomic status have the longest history taking the SAT. Over time more students of more modest socioeconomic backgrounds have taken the SAT.

This changing SAT demographic matters because socioeconomic background is correlated with SAT scores. (See the relationship of parental education to SAT scores.) As the composition of the students taking the test changes, comparisons to earlier groups of test-takers become less valid. It is difficult to know whether changes in SAT scores over time are due to the changing demographics of the test-takers or to changes in academic achievement.

As if this wasn’t a big enough problem, the SAT has been redesigned recently. These redesigns also make comparisons across time problematic.

For all of these reasons and more, the SAT is a bad measure for trying to assess the academic achievement of students and trends in student achievement. Nonetheless, year after year, journalists continue to use the SAT in this way.

A far better tool for tracking students’ academic achievement over time is the long-term trend scores of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The long-term trend NAEP tests are given to nationally representative samples of 9 year olds, 13 year olds, and 17 year olds every four years. Unlike the SAT, NAEP scores for 17 year olds really do allow us to make conclusions about high school seniors nationally.

There are several versions of the NAEP tests. There is the national, state, urban district and long-term trend. The long-term trend, like its name suggests, is ideal for making assessments of black student achievement over time. The test does not change and the sample is always nationally representative of students.

Over the last 30 years, black students at all three age levels have increased their long-term math and reading NAEP scores. Over the last 10 years, only black 9 year olds and 13 year olds have increased their NAEP scores. The 17-year-olds’ scores have been flat. (White 17 year-olds’ NAEP scores have been flat too.) During this time period, however, the black math SAT scores have improved. While the black students who take the SAT appear to be doing better academically, black seniors in general have stagnated since the mid-1990s. If we want to know how black students are progressing academically, the long-term trend NAEP is the far better measure.

Share this article with a friend. Use the email icon below.

--Algernon Austin, Ph.D.

Copyright © 2005-2007 by Thora Institute, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Reprint this article in your newspaper or magazine. Contact the Thora Institute to purchase reprint rights.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[The Thora Institute needs you.]

9/09/2007

Race to Incarcerate: Fashion Policing

Algernon Austin presents an excellent, concise, and wonderfully read scholarly examination of the complicated landscape of race, class and popular perception. Besides the prison industrial complex, black strides in education, poverty rates, crime and other indices contradict claims that blacks are “moving backward.”
--Jeffrey O. G. Ogbar, Director, Institute for African American Studies, University of Connecticut and author of Black Power: Radical Politics and African American Identity (The Johns Hopkins University Press), 2004 and Hip-Hop Revolution: The Culture and Politics of Rap (University Press of Kansas), 2007.


Purchase Getting It Wrong: How Black Public Intellectuals
Are Failing Black America
by Algernon Austin
Barnes & Noble.com Amazon.com

[Find out The Truth about “Acting White”.]
________________________________________________________________________

[The following is a draft of an op-ed piece which appeared in the New Haven Register.]

Is the Rise of Fashion Policing a Sign of a Deeper Problem?

Once upon a time, the idea of a “fashion police” was just an amusing metaphor. Not anymore. A small but growing number of communities, mainly in the South, are indeed requiring police to fine or jail people for the fashion of wearing their pants low enough to reveal their underwear. A Stratford, Connecticut councilman, Alvin O’Neal, recently proposed a similar law. Wisely, the town council rejected the legislation.

These laws do not make sense. They are not what they claim to be about. If one is offended by the public display of people in underwear then shouldn’t Victoria’s Secret and Calvin Klein underwear ads be high on one’s hit list. Of course, Victoria’s Secret and Calvin Klein are just the most prominent among the underwear advertisers. Even this newspaper distributes advertising with pictures of people in underwear. As pervasive as underwear advertising is, one hears no mention of calls to ban this advertising among those who claim to be offended by the sight of underwear.

Of course, one should not stop at advertising. Swimming suits look remarkably like underwear. Revealing those would have to be outlawed too. So, maybe the anti-underwear lawmakers will propose banning swimming next.

Nicole Kidman and the editors of Vanity Fair who have Kidman showing her bra on the cover of this month’s issue should be fined or jailed also. And all of the other magazines showing bras or bikinis on their covers, from Sports Illustrated for the Swimsuit Issue to Shape magazine, would have to be punished also.

It is not unusual for people to be offended by new fashion styles. In the 1960s, adults were scandalized by men’s long hair, big afros, and mini-skirts. In the 1970s, the spiked and neon dyed hair and torn clothes of punks shocked many. In the 1980s, Madonna made bras and bustiers outerwear causing some outrage. In the 1990s, droopy pants arrived. The shock, anger, and outrage that followed were not surprising. The idea to put people in jail for their sagging pants is.

How did we get here? Why is it that at this point in time criminalizing fashion seems like a good idea to some lawmakers? How did people become so cavalier about restricting American’s rights to freedom of expression? These laws seem to be symptoms of a deeper problem.

The fact of the matter is that these laws are not about decency in the sense that they have been crafted. Councilman Alvin O’Neal revealed as much when he stated, “We’re not out to get plumbers whose pants creep down while working on your pipes.” But why not? Why is the top of a plumber’s butt okay but boxer shorts are not? Boxer shorts are in fact clothing, which should be preferable to an actual butt partially exposed by a plumber. O’Neal’s preference for actual partial nudity over boxer shorts, shows that this has nothing to do with protecting our eyes.

The idea that the problem is that this style may have arisen in prisons is not very convincing. Many of the most violent criminal gang members have tattoos, but I haven’t heard of anyone trying to outlaw tattoos. At least, not yet.

What are these laws really about, then? These laws seem crafted to hurt a despised population, not to protect the public from the “harm” of seeing people’s underwear. The lawmakers seem to have little respect for the rights of the type of people who they believe expose their boxer shorts, but they still do have respect for the rights and needs of the type of people they think become plumbers.

Maybe I am wrong about this issue. Maybe it is simply that fewer Americans value our freedoms today. After all, Congress recently expanded the government’s powers to spy on Americans without a warrant, weakening our Fourth Amendment rights. Maybe we simply value our freedoms less today than in the past.

My parents often were not happy with my choice of clothing and grooming. Since they have passed, my older brother has taken over their role. Every time I see him, he tells me I need to get a haircut. Every time! This is his right. This is a legitimate type of pressure for him to exert to get me to meet his standards. I, however, still don’t conform enough for his tastes. As recalcitrant as my brother thinks I am, he has never considered it a criminal offense.


Share this article with a friend. Use the email icon below.

--Algernon Austin, Ph.D.

Copyright © 2005-2007 by Thora Institute, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Reprint this article in your newspaper or magazine. Contact the Thora Institute to purchase reprint rights.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

[The Thora Institute needs you.]

9/03/2007

The Myth of the Black Teen Suicide Epidemic

Algernon Austin presents an excellent, concise, and wonderfully read scholarly examination of the complicated landscape of race, class and popular perception. Besides the prison industrial complex, black strides in education, poverty rates, crime and other indices contradict claims that blacks are “moving backward.”
--Jeffrey O. G. Ogbar, Director, Institute for African American Studies, University of Connecticut and author of Black Power: Radical Politics and African American Identity (The Johns Hopkins University Press), 2004 and Hip-Hop Revolution: The Culture and Politics of Rap (University Press of Kansas), 2007.


Purchase Getting It Wrong: How Black Public Intellectuals
Are Failing Black America
by Algernon Austin
Barnes & Noble.com Amazon.com

[Find out The Truth about "Acting White".]
________________________________________________________________________

from the files of Mike Males

[The assertion of a black teen suicide epidemic has never been very well supported by the official statistics. In the 2001 article below, Mike Males goes even further and argues that the official statistics were distorted. Please note that this 2001 article does not address the recent report of an increase in the suicide rate in 2004. MSNBC has a discussion of the recent trend. Note the graph in the middle of the MSNBC article “Official Suicide Rate Down.”]

Recent alarms that suicide is skyrocketing among teenagers, especially African Americans, demonstrate that the only way to present youth issues fairly today is to avoid repeating secondhand statistics, no matter how apparently trustworthy the source. Authorities, from the US Centers for Disease Control to African-American physician Alvin Poussaint to media reports, assert that teenagers (particularly black males) are blowing themselves away in record numbers. From these chilling statistics, theories abound: modern youths are causing, and suffering, unprecedented, horrific dangers. More programs, more psychiatric interventions, more forced institutionalizations, and more abrogation of teenagers’ rights are advanced in the name of protecting them from their rising urge to self-destruct.

In fact, the entire premise of a teen suicide epidemic, especially among blacks, is a textbook lesson in statistical malpractice. The same references interest groups miscite actually show that modern teens, especially African Americans, are less likely to die by their own hand than at any time in at least half a century, and probably ever. How, then, have authorities manufactured the frightening image of rising adolescent self-destruction? By omitting massive changes in how deaths are classified. Consider the following vital statistics compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics:

In 1970, 1,352 black teens (age 10-19) died from self-inflicted causes (drug overdoses, poisonings, falls, drownings, gunshots, hangings, suffocations, sharp instruments, and individual traffic crashes). Of these, 103 deaths were ruled suicides, 1,080 were ruled “accidents,” and 169 were ruled “undetermined” as to intent (that is, the coroner couldn’t figure out whether the person died accidentally or purposely).

In 1980, 767 black teenagers died from these same self-inflicted causes. Of these, 117 were ruled suicides, 596 were ruled “accidents,” and 54 were ruled “undetermined.”

In 1998, just 639 black teenagers died from these self-inflicted causes. Of these, 222 were ruled suicides, 375 were ruled “accidents,” and 42 were ruled “undetermined.”

Can you see what is happening here? On one hand, the total number of black teenage self-destructive deaths plummeted (1,352 in 1970, 639 in 1998). On the other, the number of black teenage deaths ruled as suicides leaped (103 in 1970, 222 in 1998). So, how can black teen suicide have “doubled” at the same time only half as many black teens are killing themselves? Let us consider a powerful possibility the experts overlooked.

In order to certify a death as a “suicide,” a coroner must provide solid evidence (by a note, or investigation) that the death was intentionally caused. For lack of expertise or interest, pressure from families, religious concerns, insurance considerations, and other reasons, coroners are reluctant to rule a death (particularly a youthful death) as a suicide. A number of scientific studies have found that coroners of past decades ruled hundreds of self-inflicted teenage deaths as “accidents” (or as “undetermined” as to intent) that, given today’s more sophisticated diagnostic techniques, would be ruled suicides. Especially in southern and rural areas, expending coroner time and money to investigate whether a black teen death was an accident or a suicide wasn’t a priority. So, as Poussaint correctly suggests (in a point that refutes his claim of a modern "crisis"), black suicide has been “historically underreported.”

A startling example: in 1970, coroners ruled 169 black teenage deaths as “undetermined” because they couldn’t (or didn’t bother to) ascertain whether a suspicious, self-inflicted gunshot wound or drug overdose was accidental or intentional. In 1998, the number of black teenage deaths ruled as “undetermined” had fallen to just 42. Note that the supposed “increase” in black teen suicides (up 119 since 1970) almost perfectly matches the “decline” in black teenage “undetermined” deaths (down 127) -- even without allowing for the bigger decline in self-inflicted deaths ruled as “accidents” (down 705)!

More evidence: in California, where coroners traditionally called in suicide experts to accurately certify questionable deaths, black teenage suicide DECLINED by 40 percent over the last three decades. Meanwhile, in southern states, black teen suicides skyrocketed” from a scattering in 1970 to scores today. If some new, generational stressors are raising teen suicide, why is it falling sharply in California? These are the kinds of complications officials and experts are duty-bound to resolve before issuing alarming statements on emotional topics such as teen suicide -- yet they did not.

Whatever the politics, the bottom line is straightforward. In 1998, there were 800,000 more black teenagers in the population than in 1970. Yet, among black teen males, suicidal deaths fell sharply, from 1,093 in 1970 to 549 in 1998. Among black teenage girls, the drop in self-demise was even larger: 259 deaths in 1970, just 78 in 1998.

By rate, then, today’s average black teen male is 57 percent, and today’s average black teen female is 73 percent, less like to take his/her own life than their counterparts of 30 years ago. In fact, fewer black teens died by self-destructive means in 1998 than in 1950, when the black youth population was only one-third as large!

Two conclusions are evident. First, the teenage suicide “epidemic” is an artifact of changes in death classification, not an increase in youthful demise. Second, the reality is that teens display spectacular declines in self-inflicted hazard. Rarely do epidemiologists record such rapid decreases in fatalities over such a short period. Yet, the media and experts blare an incessant dirge that this increasingly healthy, resilient generation is killing itself at unheard-of rates.

Many groups justify their political tactic of “creating a crisis” as necessary to preserving support for the unquestionably fine, underfunded suicide prevention and mental health programs some youths need. But in the end, the myth of a teen suicide epidemic is not benign, no matter how humanely couched. It frightens the public that all young people are lethally out of control. It activates psychiatric industries lathering to profit, programs gearing up to manage, moralists eager to censor, police girding to suppress. Perhaps most disturbing, the “teen suicide” hype exposes the alarming extent to which major interests freely reduce young people to mere commodities to advance pet agendas when we should be pondering why--despite overcrowded schools, defunded services, dead-end jobs, and incessant denigration by their elders--today's younger generation is NOT descending into self-hatred and suicide.

More details can be found at Mike Males’ website http://home.earthlink.net/~mmales/.

Share this article with a friend. Use the email icon below.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

[The Thora Institute needs you.]